 Wysłany: Nie 22:39, 12 Gru 2010 Temat postu: ugg stiefel Equal retirement age for women with pr |
|
| Article 6 of the Constitution
, Of course, not all the relevant standards are not discriminatory. If standards are not good for the disadvantaged, does not constitute discrimination. To disadvantage people because of better treatment to citizens in the results caused by the excessive disparity between the situation. [4] but may constitute a neglect of equality between the destruction pose a real sense of discrimination. Can be divided into the same equality and equality between equality. Equality means the same regardless of differences between people, be given the same opportunity, emphasizing equality of opportunity; equality means taking into account individual differences and individual differences, given the situation better conditions than the disadvantaged. From the perspective of equality between objectively existing differences to pass laws regulating it be possible to achieve real equality. The law Providing that Women Retire at 55 Years Old Is Correspond to Constitutional Law Union WWW.LWLM.COM this paper from China collected. Than between men and women there are significant differences in induction, that is physiological and anatomical differences, such differences so that a woman has the ability to reproduce, while men do not. The difference between men and women in the upbringing of their children so that women pay more attention. [7] The result: the private domain of our society reflect feminine characteristics, and the public domain is increasingly masculine. Generally speaking, the law only adjust the public domain, you can not reach more into his private domain. This forces us to use some in the public domain, \This \[8] In contrast, if so that women and men in the labor area to enjoy the same rights and obligations, the status of women is inevitable,ugg stiefel, such as \ 2005 年 11 月 with Miss Zhou Xianghua occurred in Henan Province of China Construction Bank v. Central Branch Pingdingshan case triggered a 55-year-old retired female constitutionality of the discussion. [1] from the face in the crowd may be too far past the Constitution,Laguna Beach Jeans, we can not wait to feel today always returning to the Desert to meet this - so, \Whatever is \ ????? Abstract The right to equal don't exclude classification. The law providing that women retire at 55 years old is the special mesure to protect women, is correspond to constitutional law. Women couldn't reject the special measure to protect themselves. Key words The constitutionality of the special protection of equality That is, if you do not consider a particular profession, but from the general sense, the gender differences between men and women does not necessarily concerned with the ability to work. Conditions we decided to retire at the age of sex outside the standard criteria used is a non-relevant standards. As has been discussed earlier, do not constitute discrimination against the relevant standards, depends on the purpose of adopting this standard is not to protect the interests of the disadvantaged. Specific to the topic of this article, so that women retire at the age of 55 is not to protect women's interests. -------------------------------- Whether a person needs to retire? Age is a relevant standard. In general, the working capacity of the elderly than the young to be weak. It is in this sense, no one said that the elderly constitute a retirement pension for young people without discrimination against the elderly. The problem is, we age, the establishment of a gender other than the standard criteria, gender standards and whether the relationship between people's ability to work? This involves the issue of gender equality. Support the Constitution not only to achieve warm, but also more rational. Miss Zhou Xianghua s Henan Province of China Construction Bank v. Central Branch of itself is not a constitutional case, but a labor law dispute. But out of those packages constitutional cases compared to the case itself involved more constitutional questions. 55 for women on retirement that scholars and the public are basically equal rights from the angle of the problem. To avoid \ Differences between male and female is about retirement? That is, a 55-year-old male and a 55-year-old female comparison, whether the 55-year-old male ability to be stronger than the labor of women 55 years old? If you do not distinguish between types of labor, the problem can not have the only correct answer. Most differences between men and women from the statistical sum, the precise statistical difference between men and women in the following does not apply to individual cases: weight, height,mbt shoes cheap, life, mathematical potential, aggressive (aggression), raising children ability and physical strength. Republic of China is based on the socialist economic system of socialist public ownership of production, namely, ownership by the whole collective working people. Socialist public ownership of exploitation of man by man, doing our best to implement, the principle of distribution according to work. Equal protection does not exclude the classification is not exclusive to the different categories of groups equipped with different rights. Only the classification was unreasonable violation of \Federal High Court by the United States in 1920 as saying: \,],[ Classification is justified, must meet two requirements. First, the constitutionality of the law must have the purpose, or that the legislative classification is for a legitimate public interest to grant or eliminate public hazards; Second, the law must be a reasonable means to achieve constitutional goals. [3] The second requirement can be expressed as the correlation between means and ends. In other words, no matter what kind of standards, standards and objectives must be some connection between the legal classification is means to an end, there is no classification of such a link is arbitrary, capricious classification. This is our usual sense of the \ Equality and women prefer ---- constitutionality of the provisions of the retirement age <div style=\Female 55 years old retired legal provisions are of special protection measures for women, is constitutional. Women can not give up the law on their special protection. It is in this sense, labor is both a right and an obligation. First, equal protection and permitted the difference Men and women in the labor of the right to equality does not mean that men and women enjoy the same rights and obligations. Provisions of labor law to fulfill labor obligations of women in the difference with men. Specific to women 55 years of retirement on the provisions, if interpreted as the special protection of women workers, it is constitutional. But the problem does not end there. Because we said 55-year-old retired special protection to women, women may or may not appreciate - the special protection to women under the law the rights of women, women Can you give up this right? If you can give,moncler jacken, the law should be changed: women can decide on the age of 55 to 60 years old retire. Thus, the next we have to discuss is: 55-year-old retired female system of protection of women, women can not give up such a labor protection. Rich enough in material information before the work is still our means of sustenance, to communism, labor is our first need. In our Constitution, the labor is a means to acquire wealth: Article 33 of our Constitution, \Equality is a principle or a right to dispute. If you do not return to standard, this argument is impossible to have any results. Domestic scholars in fact, the debate on this issue stays in the \And what should be? Adhere to the standards of the poor scholars. If the return to standard levels, the problem is not difficult to answer. China's Constitution the principle of equality is a need for other meaningful superposition principle. Key words Equal Special measure to protect Legitimacy \the same treatment may violate the concept of equality, ignore the differences may mean ignoring the legality of requirements. ... ... ignore the differences and refused to regulate them is equal access and equal opportunities denied. That is discrimination. \ We are the first to admit, from the perspective of human dignity, equality between the sexes. [6] the beginning of a series of laws from the constitution, have repeatedly emphasized this rule. But equality does not exclude the special protection given to women. Article 48 of the Constitution specifically provides for equality between the sexes after the protection of women. China as well as \ Specific to the case, what is right with the superposition principle of equality for it? Is clearly the right to work. Specifically, if the female retirement age of 55 if the violation of the constitutional rights of women, then women should be a violation of the equal right to work. In fact, we worry too far from our Constitution, we should also prevent the broken heart - the use must comply with the constitutional principle of the Middle Path. Somewhere over the constitutional type of course and religion is no different,moncler doudoune, but if the constitution dress up surprisingly low class people, the constitution also would be blasphemy - if the constitution of any seemingly just for us to provide justification to support the action, the result would be the Constitution does not for the legitimacy of our actions to provide any support. Second, the nature of retirement: can not give up the right Countries in the primary stage of socialism, uphold the public ownership dominant and diverse forms of ownership develop the basic economic system, adhere to the distribution according to work is dominant and a variety of modes of distribution coexist distribution system. But say still a bit vague. Although the total, said China's commitment to the labor law obligations to women than men, enjoy the right to work than men. However, if specific to a particular system can still be the same men and women: for example, equal pay for men and women of our Constitution. More articles related to topics： UGG ブーツ Rigid rules and their impact on the Chi UGG Schuhe Removal of cotton fiber _5594 heterosex ugg jimmy choo Three issues of State Compensation Law _2758 |
|
